![](https://i0.wp.com/3.bp.blogspot.com/_mpBGa4P5jUo/SikPkQyyQdI/AAAAAAAADUQ/CK9tbc4QeEM/s400/200px-Memoirs_of_an_invisible_man.jpg)
In a detailed, illuminating piece, Jim contextualizes the film as a Carpenter-style updating of the Hitchcock suspense thriller, a “wrong man” picture such as North by Northwest (1960):
In a nutshell it’s a wrong man, cross-country chase, featuring visually dazzling set pieces, an expansive orchestral score, and an undercurrent of humor. They even get on a train at one point. Having read the book (I’ll touch on that more in a moment) I can tell you that this Hitchcockian approach was developed for the movie, and I have to believe that’s what attracted Carpenter to this project. So with Memoirs I’d argue that Carpenter is doing nothing less than what he has done with so many of his movies, by adapting a version of a film favorite into another genre (sci-fi) perceived more agreeable to modern (circa-1992) audiences. So his name being absent before the title notwithstanding, this is most definitely a Carpenter film in the most important sense.
Now, anyone out there want to stand up and blog in support for Village of the Damned (1995)?